Opinion
When religion and military regulation clash
By Charles C. Haynes
CNHI News Service
Unless U.S. Army officials act quickly, Capt. Kamaljit Singh Kalsi and 2nd Lt. Capt. Tejdeep Singh Rattan will soon be compelled to choose between obedience to God and service to country.
The two officers, members of the Sikh religion, wore turbans and beards throughout their military training, having been assured by recruiters that those articles of their faith wouldn’t be a problem.
But now that they have finished medical and dental school, respectively, the Army wants them to take off the turbans and cut their hair before reporting for active duty this month.
Asking Sikh Americans to deny their faith as a condition of military service is an example of what the late Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once called a “cruel choice” between religious faith and full participation in American life. It is a choice, wrote Stewart, that “no State can constitutionally demand.”
After months of lobbying for a change in the regulations, Sikhs got a glimmer of hope a few weeks ago when Army officials promised to review the policy in a letter to the Sikh Coalition, a human-rights advocacy group. It shouldn’t be a hard call. Before 1986, when these guidelines were promulgated, Sikhs with turbans and beards served honorably in the Army without any harm to order or discipline.
The Army isn’t the only arena where Sikhs in America face discrimination. In workplaces, schools, airports and elsewhere, Sikhs often encounter ignorance about their religion and resistance to requests for accommodation. And with Sikhism growing in the U.S. – there are currently some 500,000 Sikh Americans – the level of discrimination is likely to rise unless more is done to address the problem.
Most of the conflicts involve challenges to core religious obligations of observant Sikhs, including unshorn hair, wearing a turban, and carrying the kirpan, a small religious sword worn under clothing as a symbol of a Sikh’s duty to uphold justice.
Last month Sikhs and supporters rallied in New York City to protest the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s policy requiring Sikh transit workers to put the MTA patch on their turbans. MTA officials claim the patches are needed to help customers identify workers – even though employees wear uniforms. Since branding a sacred space with the MTA logo is unacceptable to Sikhs, the policy would bar Sikhs from working for the MTA.
More than half of the New York City Council as well as the U.S. Dept. of Justice want the MTA to abandon the policy. But the MTA appears determined to wage a court battle if necessary to keep the logo requirement.
Sikh policemen have also had to struggle to get accommodation, often going to court to win the right to wear turbans and beards. Although they have won a number of legal victories, including a favorable 2004 ruling in New York City, Sikhs continue to face barriers to serving in police departments around the country.
Not all police officials resist religious-liberty claims. Some departments have decided to take another tack by welcoming Sikh applicants. In June, two California departments, Yuba City and Richmond, invited Sikhs to apply and promised that they would be able to wear turbans and have beards.
Some of the most difficult accommodation battles are fought in public schools. In some states – Oregon and Pennsylvania, for example – observant Sikhs are effectively barred from teaching school under state laws prohibiting teachers from wearing any religious garb.
For Sikh students, the major issue is wearing kirpans in violation of the “no weapons” policies common to all public schools. At first blush this practice may seem impossible to accommodate. Nevertheless, a number of school districts in New York and California have found a way to maintain safety while upholding religious freedom: Sikh students are allowed to wear the kirpan (several inches long) under their clothing, but it must be riveted into the sheath. Under those conditions, the kirpan is less of a potential weapon than a pencil.
If these school officials can find a way to allow the kirpan, then surely the Army and police can accommodate recruits who must wear turbans and beards as a matter of faith. Surely the MTA in New York City can function just fine without sticking logos on turbans.
Sikh Americans, like other Americans, want to defend their country, serve their communities, send their children to school, and in other ways participate fully in American life. But Sikhs shouldn’t be asked to violate their conscience in order to enjoy the rights and privileges of citizenship. It’s time to stop putting them to that cruel choice.
---
Charles C. Haynes is senior scholar at the First Amendment Center in Washington, D.C. Contact him at chaynes@freedomforum.org.
- Opinion
-
-
The day my soaking turned to gushing
I got one of those dreaded telephone calls while away from home on a recent Saturday night.
The good news is that the call had nothing to do with car wrecks or emergency rooms.
But the news was bad enough. -
‘Don’t say I didn’t warn you’
When I look at some of the lawsuits being filed nowadays, I see certain elements of a Wild West mentality: claim anything you want, regardless of how ridiculous or unsupportable it sounds. Maybe you’ll get poured out on the sidewalk by a no-nonsense judge or a jury with its collective head screwed on straight, but just maybe your common sense-defying allegations will be warmly received and you’ll get the legal system’s equivalent of a golden ticket.
-
There’s an upcoming game I will never forget
I remember my first game as a high school football player like it happened just 48 years ago.
That’s using a roundabout journalistic maneuver to tell you that I have no memory of that game because it occurred such a long, long time ago. -
‘It’s summertime, and the litigating is good’
A judge friend of mine swears that the strangest lawsuits in his court always seem to happen in the summertime. I don’t know how much empirical evidence there is to back up this theory, but it does sometime seem like an upsurge in the “legally weird” takes place during the warmer months.
Just within the last few weeks, for example, we’ve witnessed an epidemic of bizarre bank robberies and attempted robberies. Around the country, bank robbers have conducted heists while wearing everything from Darth Vader masks to clown suits. Other stick-up artists have tried to obscure their appearance using everything from a bouquet of flowers to a set of Spanxx (the girdle-like ladies’ undergarment). -
Message to the U.S. House leadership: Create jobs and cut spending
As Congress adjourns for the August District Work Period, many challenges remain to restore fiscal health to the economy. Struggling families worry about job security, cost of living expenses, higher taxes, rising health care costs and increasing costs of education. Small businesses brace for higher costs in health care mandates, higher taxes, and other regulatory burdens. Those who have lost their job find that securing another one in this time of record-high unemployment can be daunting.
-
I don’t know, I need help, I was wrong
This space is filled every week with what I call my recreational writing.
I write about what I want to write about and most of the time it’s fun.
And I try to make it light. -
Stolen valor and stolen justice
I’ve previously written about the Stolen Valor Act, a federal law passed in 2006 that makes it a crime for individuals to falsely claim that they had been awarded military decorations and medals.
The act carries a punishment ranging from fines to up to a year in prison. -
I have found my new name: ’Biggest Loser’
If I had my own television show, I could call it, “Biggest Loser.”
In this case, the name would not apply to weight lost. Instead, it would refer to stuff lost.
I am convinced that I am the champion loser of stuff. -
Scents and Sensibility: ‘When evidence doesn’t pass the smell test’ (Part IV)
“Forensic evidence is often offered in criminal prosecutions and civil litigation to support conclusions about individualization — in other words, to ‘match’ a piece of evidence to a particular person, weapon, or other source. But with the exception of nuclear DNA analysis, no forensic method has been rigorously shown able to consistently, and with a high degree of certainty, demonstrate a connection between evidence and a specific individual or source.”
— from “Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward,” February 18, 2009, a Congressionally-mandated report from the National Research Council of the National Research Academies -
Now we get to blow stuff up too!!!
You will remember that a few weeks ago I wrote to you all about the upcoming outdoor concert that was being planned by MusicFest (which I have joined, just so I’m being straightforward and all).
- More Opinion Headlines
-
The day my soaking turned to gushing
